š„µ
āIām so proud of you, baby. Look at my dirty girl getting off by just humping Daddyās thigh. No, no, no, donāt turn away from me. There is no reason to be embarrassed; keep those gorgeous eyes right on me. Thatās my good girl, just like that. Daddy really has turned you into such a dirty little toy, hasnāt he? Just look at you, precious. Completely naked on Daddyās thigh, rubbing your needy little cunt till you get off.ā
Promise?
Did you know, she can't give you an attitude with a mouthful of cock? š
nothing makes me feel filthier than you making me talk when Iām choking on your fingers or your cock. It will get me dripping every time
āwho owns this pussy baby? hm?
say it again i canāt hear youā¦
louderā¦
aww whatās the matter baby, canāt speak with your mouth full?
yeah? no no no, donāt try and pull away from me, tell me again, who owns this pussy?
youāre gonna stay right here and choke on my dick until you tell meā
I so love the dynamic of you standing over me while you use my body. Dominating me just with presence alone š„µ
Fun fact: the first videos I ever masturbated to were of girls making out. I imagine those videos shaped how I kiss and how I like to be kissed.
I think the pleases serve a few different functions:
Theyāre a good way to signal that I want to come and that Iām getting close to coming. Itās a way to tell you that youāre on the right track.
there is something immensely satisfying with the power dynamic that gets generated by them. Saying please please please is just me begging you. That means that you are in a position where you get to decide whether to give me what I want or not. So itās not that I think you will stop, but more that you could stop if you chose to.
I think that repeating please indicates a certain level of incoherence. itās the idea that whatever youāre doing to me is so incredible that itās rendered me incapable of saying anything except please over and over again. I personally find that very arousing.
When subs do that little įµĖ”įµįµĖ¢įµ įµĖ”įµįµĖ¢įµ įµĖ”įµįµĖ¢įµ before cumming. ā”
God this one is so appealing, and I donāt have a total understanding of why. Itās hard to explain how I can like sex with you when itās very methodically discussed/agreed upon and I can also like sex with you when thereās less dialogue and thereās instead just one person taking charge and having their way with the other. My best guess is that thereās a deep feeling of safety that I have with you that even when youāre treating me like your toy, I know it wonāt be in a way that harms me.
i dont know man. Either way Iām super turned on now and I want this real bad. Another pro of not having roommates is that this becomes achievable š¹
touch me like you own me. come up behind me and squeeze my tits while we're cooking. flip up my skirt whenever I bend over, slide my panties to the side and wet your fingers there. put them in my mouth afterward. make me spread my legs and show you my pretty cunt while you work.
just, treat me like your favourite toy
I think we do both pretty well āŗļø
You can have both
this is called argument to moderation or the middle ground fallacy! It is truly one of the most easily debunked fallacies out there, and this graphic does a great job of achieving exactly that. But it did get me thinking about why the fallacy is so common in the first place.
my best guess is that a significant amount of time and effort goes into embedding children with the values of compromising, sharing, and reaching common ground, and in the elementary school setting, that approach is pretty dang important.
i.e friends Sally and Jenny spend recess together. Sally wants to go on the swings but Jenny wants to go on the slides during recess. Solution: what if the first half of recess they play on the swings and the second half they play on the slides. this line of thinking works incredibly well in the elementary school setting because itās very rare that people of that age range are ever coming up with inherently āwrongā options or viewpoints. Thereās nothing (from a moral values standpoint) that makes swings better than slides so thereās nothing wrong with treating them equally and creating a 50/50 solution. The trouble comes when we donāt move away from this line of thinking as thoughts develop and people can (and do) come up with morally wrong viewpoints. Having the skill of compromise in oneās tool belt is valuable, but it is not a standalone skill. It must be accompanied by an understanding of how to investigate which viewpoints are worth compromising for. It may feel uncomfortable, but knowing when not to relent is just as important as being open to change. I love the middle ground fallacy. thanks for coming to my ted talk š¹
pretty