22 posts
This taken from Willie Lynch’s letter on how to control the Black slave:
http://www.iupui.edu/~blacksu/PDF%20Documents/Documents/WillieLynchLetter.pdf
It offers proof POSITIVE of the systematic demise and planning of the Black Family Unit and the emasculation of (and on) the Black Man in so called America.
To think that white slave owners and racist people as well as an entire nation captured, enslaved, transported, sold, traded, branded, breed (us like domesticated dogs, horses and animals) and terrorized a group of Black Nubian Human Beings for over 400 Hundred years is mind boggling in of itself!
Given that so many Black Hookers & Hoes won’t even see their own Black Brethren and Men as clients is just further testament to the mental brain washing on the Black psyche that the system at large does on a continued and daily basis.
You can rest assure that yours truly: Downtown Barbara Brown will always cater to my fallen BLACK KINGS and provide them a refuge for comfort and stress relief and a perfect place to bust your nutt!
Don’t allow yourself to fall prey to the soft mentality of so called Black females who have transformed themselves physically to the European standard of beauty by wearing these ridiculous long flowing hair (hat) weaves and lightening their skin as well as mentally transforming themselves to turn their backs on their own Black men no different than racist bigoted whites who despise the Black Human Being at the highest order.
Take a Stand Black Man!
There are some of us Black Soul Sisters that STILL believe in YOU!
"Clyde Kennard is known to scholars of the civil rights movement, but his name is not familiar to most Americans. It needs to be. He paved the way for many, and some, like me, learned from his mistakes as well as his perseverance. My hope is that this book goes a long way in finally giving Clyde Kennard his due."
The history behind tipping is racist.
Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.
1) “Do you know why I stopped you?” Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.
2) “Do you have something to hide?” Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.
3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.” The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.” (Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)
4) “We’ll just get a warrant.” Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.
5.) We have someone who will testify against you Police “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.
6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.” Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.
7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.” Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).
Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.
Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want
The Burning of Greenwood Oklahoma
Black Wall Street
-May 31 1921
Black Doctor Scolds All White USDA Dietary Guidelines Committee ..... Saves some lives by sharing this.... BLACK PEOPLE DON'T REQUIRE DAIRY and it's killing them!
Since people don’t want to hear and respect Sebi because he wasn’t “official” from the westernized medical field . Here is a black dr telling you dairy is not for our bodies . Also meats but that’s another story .
Break down of (His - Story ) not our story
Gil Scott heron
Why not?!
Black people hair
Black history
Our history is so vast and diverse . We live everywhere around the globe .
The reason why they don’t want us to know the kemets were African . Not Arab , not mixed .
They were all brown and dark skinned African people .
Throughout history’s Europeans and Arabs been destroying Egypt and disrespecting the ancestors . Selling our artifacts to museums . Removing our ancestors from their resting place . They know they are not those people so they destroy it .
IS YOUR PENIS HEALTHY?
Penis health is an important part of your health — and it goes beyond your ability to get and keep an erection, ejaculate, and reproduce.
Penis problems can be a sign of an underlying health condition. Ongoing health issues affecting your penis also can impact other areas of your life, causing stress, relationship problems or poor self-confidence. Know the signs and symptoms of penis problems and what you can do to protect your penis health.
You need to have erections regularly to keep your penis in shape. "It has to be essentially exercised." To maintain a healthy tone, the smooth muscle of the penis must be periodically enriched with oxygen by the rush of blood that engorges the penis and makes it erect.
If men don't do anything to maintain normal erections, they will get shortening of the penis. Without regular erections, penile tissue can become less elastic and shrink, making the penis 1-2 centimeters shorter.
A device like a vacuum pump, which forces the penis to swell with blood, can help men with physical erection problems maintain a healthy penis.
The best way to boost penis health? Food.
We often eat with our hearts and stomachs in mind, but how often do we consider how foods affect extremely specific body parts?
Instead of eating as if your penis needs special attention, fill your day with foods that optimize your whole body, and in turn, help your blood bring the nutrients, vitamins, and minerals your penis needs to function. (Erectyle Dysfunction in younger men is rising and about 1 in 9 men will develop prostate cancer in their lifetime.) The penis is dependent on testosterone to function properly, and anything that lowers the T can lower the D. The 13 foods and drink below are among the worst cockblockers.
1.Soy
A study found that two scoops of pure soy protein powder a day decreased men’s testosterone levels by 19 percent after four weeks.
2.White Bread and Processed Carbs
Eating too many simple carbs can lead to weight gain, and increased body flab has been shown to raise a man’s estrogen levels and lower ...visit my Facebook page Titus Unlimited to read the full article
“Starting in 1945 and running through the late 1940s, Elton Clay Fax drew a biographical panel cartoon entitled They’Il Never Die, depicting Black notables.
black art,historyThese cartoons were syndicated by Continental Features to Black newspapers, and were reprinted numerous times…
Throughout his career, Fax illustrated over thirty books and numerous magazine articles.
He wrote extensively on black culture as well, publishing several books and regularly contributing essays to a variety of magazines and newspapers. “
Get “Invisible Men: The Trailblazing Black Artists of Comic Books” here
[SuperheroesInColor linktr.ee / FB / IG / Twitter / Twitch / Support ]