Can a cause be worth dying for? Or is it the sacrifice for the sake of something that proves the thing valuable?
There’s two ways to look at the members of the Phantom Troupe, by looking at the things they do to other people,and at the things they do to themselves and each other.
Seeing how much they identify with the Spider,we can throw the theory of them just being selfish psychopaths out of the windows. Neither do they seem manic or crazy,and yet..in a way they remind us of a cult. Besides that,I’ve also found them to have qualities or the following: rebels,revolutionaries,soldiers,robinhoods,martyrs.
Despite committing so much undeniable evil,and despite them never really saying it,there’s clearly a greater good involved. This idea of something bigger is exactly what the story is subverting,and seemingly critiquing. Or is it?
It might be what makes those characters so captivating and interesting-their unquestioning devotion to the entity that is more than just the sum of themselves,what they live trough and die for - The Spider. Why would the proof of criminals like them having principles and loyalty to something be a problem? In a weird way, the Spider has an almost redeeming function - after all it’s a reason and a potential excuse for all their horrible actions. At the same time,isn’t that what makes it a bad thing? If all those people are killing because of that one cause,isn’t it what turned them into who they are now? Isn’t it what makes them do all this evil? “I wouldn’t kill for something that requires murder.” typa issue is what we got here.
The Spider as The Cause
Whether the Spider’s existence itself is what’s most important or if it is still fulfilling a purpose like it did when it was created is up for debate,in fact it’s implied that this is exactly what causes Chrollo to feel lost and unable to understand his own motives. Another reason is that rather than standing for A cause,it merely stands for THE CAUSE,much like how “god” can stand for whatever a person cares about most.
We might wonder endlessly for what reasons exactly the Spiders are doing all of that,and while there are tangible reasons given in their backstory,they work just as well to represent people who are dedicating themselves to whatever,emphasis on dedication. Regardless of specific goals,there will be sacrifices,suffering and pain following whoever cares about anything too much.
The Spider as A Team
Besides loyalty to an idea or principle,there’s also one towards one’s group,regardless of that group’s purpose or function. Without knowing anything at all about motives,backstories,aims,etc we can still see how seriously the members take it. It’s definitely a friend group,one that can’t afford to be a found family,even if that’s what they might be naturally gravitating towards.
The group or team as the greater good is even more fundamental than any additional purpose of said group,as it stays even when the purpose changes. In that regard the Spider is like any other gang,it’s in- vs outrgoup,a small team of partners in crime vs the world.
This “one for all,all for one” dynamic could exist outside of any broader context,even if since the start the Spider was meant as an opportunity for personal fulfilment (as we know now,it was quite the opposite)
The issue comes up when seeing how much the Spider setup hurts its members (as I discussed in the post about their utilitarian approach)
Since the Spider is a villain group,it’s no wonder it’s damaging to the people involved - why would it even be good for their mental health to kill that many people? Of course they’d make enemies and eventually die because of their dangerous lifestyle. But what would really change if they never walked down the path of darkness?
Beyond Morality
Had the Troupe managed to end up as not villains but heroes,would they risk their lives any less? Could they make a bigger change? Would the dynamics within the Spider even change,if it was a more benevolent organisation? Probably not,as there would still be a goal to achieve at any cost and a collective that’s worth more than the individual. Given that it’s taken seriously enough,none of the members would avoid “giving up their lives” anyway. No,they have to give everything up for something,and there we go again.
It’s tragic that Chrollo deemed it necessary to become a villain of all things,but had he decided to protect Meter City in a less brutal way,he would’ve still lost himself in this mission and Pakunoda would’ve followed him,all while vowing to never touch him and never see inside his soul💔🥀
The other side of the coin
^from the 1999 version yorknew opening
Of course it’s the people closest to one that are meant here(I think the song is talking both to Kurapika and Chrollo telling them to value their friends over their cause)
This theme runs all through hxh,it’s present from the very start as characters on a dangerous journey have to constantly chose between reaching their goal or prioritising the safety of themselves and the people around them.
Gon and Killua’s friendship and the fun they have together >> finding Ging
Meruem spending time with Komugi >> grand plans of world domination
Bonds between individual Spiders >> The entity that is the Spider
It’s as if the series is saying “purpose and happiness lies in the here and now,not in what is grand and unreachable”
Another thing supporting this interpretation is this panel from the chimera ant arc:
The tragedy stems from human inability to “just live”,instead we require a greater narrative. It’s neither virtuous nor selfish to devote one’s life to some unreachable goal or mission, but it’s shown as irresistible,as the only way to cope with extreme circumstances.
I wouldn’t say that Togashi is outright condemning hunters,Spiders and assassins in their pursuit of meaning through extreme means, but there is shown to be great harm resulting from that.
Everyone is chasing something,and there’s really no other choice. As much as we want to determine whether the cause is worthy or not (yes because outsiders shouldn’t get away with kidnapping Meteor City’s children,no because it’s no longer about that) the actual reason the Troupe exists is because none of those kids could continue their normal life as voice actors,instead starting a life of a way different format.
There’s technically nothing stopping anyone from just “retiring” in favour of peace and quiet, but in the case of the Spiders especially that’s not even an option,it will never be enough for them.
Chrollo and his friends couldn’t have continued to live normally back then,let alone do that now,but wouldn’t it be nice?
🦋 ✵ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍
Bibliovetic
(bib - lee - oh - vet - ik)
🦋 ✵ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍
A gender relating to being at the very back of a bookstore, between shelves built close together, with books that have been forgotten and are beginning to gather dust. From Latin biblio- (the prefix for relating to books) and vetus: old. The diagonal lines are meant to seem like leaning bookshelves.
For @mogai-sunflowers’ 1000-follower event!
🦋 ✵ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍ ⤍
uhm so... screw it better?
Libracollector is a term for anyone who hoards/collects terms like books in a private library.
Day 24 of @knightlyte coining event. Prompt: collecting
DNI: ableist, racist, bigot, truscum, transmed, TERF, anti-mogai/neopronouns/xenogender, anti-mspec gay/lesbian/etc., anti-endo, queerphobe, REG, gatekeeper, anti-decolonization, anti-abortion, prolife, anti-anti, NSFW/kink/BDSM
a gender connected to the phrase “mostly void, partially stars” from welcome to night vale. this gender could be connected to stars on their own, the lights over the arby’s, and cecil gershwin palmer’s relationship with carlos the scientist
the black is for the void, the blue is for the night sky, and the purple is for queer love
Ugh, it was awful last week. I'm free from The River of Styx now tho! Had to make a goofy vent doodle about it... Senku suffers from endometriosis. And poor Ginro caught the stray.
Today we are highlighting the fictoromantic and fictosexual microlabels! We’ve received a couple of requests to talk about this label - if you’re ficto or feel connected to the label, we invite you to share about your experience!
[ID: “Ficto-romantic. Someone who is mostly only romantically attracted to fictional characters or whose romantic orientation is influenced by fictional characters. Ficto-sexual. Someone who is mostly only sexually attracted to fictional characters or whose sexuality is influenced by fictional characters. While some ficto- people may not identify as aspec, others do because they are not attracted to anyone they could form a relationship with.” Pictured are the fictoromantic and fictosexual flags. End ID.]
requested by; anon
Lilith (variations: Lily, Lillian) - "night monster"
Ambrosia (variations: Ambrose, Ambrosine) - "immortal"
Cassius (variations: Cass, Cassandra) - "hollow"
Lucien (variations: Lucius, Lucia) - "light"
Silas (variations: Sylvanus, Saul) - "forest"
Drusilla (variations: Drucelle, Drucy) - "fruitful"
Corbin (variations: Corvus, Corin) - "little crow"
Damien (variations: Danny, Deon) - "to subdue"
Adrienne (variations: Adrien, Adriana) - "dark"
Celeste (variations: Celestia, Celestine) - "heavenly"
The only ship dynamic that matters
I want to fuck him until he can't walk
If I pound into him hard enough, making his knees weak and his legs tremble, maybe he wouldn't be able to run away. He'd be forced to sit there, whimpering and panting, face bright red and dripping with sweat.
I don't care how much he begs. He's mine to toy with. He'll learn that in due time ♡
hualian to me is like the only tolerable example of "he's mean to everyone except for me" bc what it reveals is not that against his better nature, some deeply buried part of xie lian guiltily finds hua cheng's difference in treatment attractive, but rather the much funnier alternative of xie lian literally does not care that hua cheng is mean bc he himself is also kinda mean and just doesn't consider any of that super wrong to say
🔫🐰 (a lie. he loves being mean)